• Front Page » The dream you’d no longer want to live

last year, mid-September

The dream you’d no longer want to live

There was a sense of vulgarity to the whole thing.

Man City supporters, trying their best to ignore reports of a poor human rights record and corruption charges this past year, had run out of patience when their ‘ruthless’ owner Thaksin Shinawatra was suddenly unable to buy new players. On transfer deadline day he was ousted, collecting twice the money he’d paid 12 months earlier – by the Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG).

Man City fans were celebrating suddenly becoming the richest club in the world.

In the few remaining hours before the window closed, the new owners managed to cause enough of a stir to suggest the Premier League’s natural order might be threatened over the next few years. “We can win the Champions League in 10 years” has been the cry, amongst boasts of signing the world’s best players in January. Despite having just broken the British transfer record – £32 million – to lure a confused Robinho to Eastlands, the club will apparently have no problems – financially or ethically – spending £120 million on one player to help make those dreams come true.

Not so long ago, as Kevin Keegan will now have time to tell you, football clubs succeeded through clever management, shrewd buys, developing youngsters and adopting better tactics than others. In the modern day, the way to succeed in “the most exciting league in the world” is to have more money than your rivals. For how well the likes of Martin O’Neill, Harry Redknapp and David Moyes have managed their respective clubs, the glass ceiling just above their heads means they’ll achieve little more. After a superb season last year things are unravelling at Goodison, due to money of course. Everton can’t match others’ spending power and their Chairman, Bill Kenwright, offers the solution that the club needs a billionaire owner themselves.

Do billionaires grow on trees? One can only respect people who have built up vast fortunes during their lives, but also question why they would want to invest in a football club. Do they just have so much money that they want to get rid of some by donating it to clubs, or is it more likely that what got them to the level of billionaire in the first place will play a part as they eye up TV money, loyal fans and corporate facilities? Sure, come in and spend £80 million to get your new ‘toy’ into the Champions League cash cow, but ultimately most will collect a profitable return.

Man City might be the exception, just like Chelsea with Roman Abramovich, but the price of success will be felt somewhere. Without a hint of sorrow, Man City Assistant Manager Mark Bowen has warned his club’s youth players that they’ll largely be ignored in favour of paying over the odds for the world’s best players. As Man City start rising, so to will their worldwide fanbase. They already joke about overtaking their neighbours but, after years of self-smugness at been the club true Mancunians support while Man United’s followers hail from Essex, their die-hards might have to get used to the people sat next to them at games having funny accents. If Man City were a band, they’d be accused of selling out.

Last week someone asked me if I was jealous no billionaires were eyeing up Bradford City and I surprised them with my negative reply.

Suddenly having the relative fortune to buy the best players and rise up the leagues might seem exciting, but the price is one we’d more than likely have to pay. Would a billionaire appreciate the virtues of offering supporters cheap season tickets? Would they think there was a point to the youth team? Would we bother harbouring links in the community? Already Mark Lawn has uttered the ‘brand’ word when talking about City, but it’s a long way removed from the rampant commercialism of his Premier League counterparts.

Of course the Bantams were guilty of throwing money in pursuit of the elitists’ dreams eight years ago and the consequences are still with us. The aim, during those six weeks of madness, was to speed up the club’s growth beyond its natural resources but, unless you have an Ambromich or ADUG to soak up the losses, it’s a huge gamble.

We learned some harsh lessons when reality set in but for all the misery it has caused, not just to us supporters but the people who lost money due to our actions, one also wonders how happy we’d really be had it succeeded and we were now a regular Premiership club, when even the wildest of ambitions would stretch to no more than touching that glass ceiling.

Back in the big four, Arsene Wenger has made laudable noises about ensuring Arsenal becomes self-sustaining in a few years, rather than relying on the pocket of a rich owner. He’s pinned his faith in a youth system which, while not above criticism, has reaped great rewards. Their impatient fans might not agree but, if the team takes a few years to succeed, it will still be all the more worthy for doing it the right way. Some ran off into the sun at the whiff of more money, but Arsenal are building a team of players fully committed to their club’s cause.

Stuart McCall did not use money to persuade those who joined this summer; he used his own ambitions for glory and the club’s biggest asset, its fanbase. Last week Stuart revealed that promotion this season would surpass anything he has achieved in his football career.

“I have been lucky enough to realise a few dreams in football but promotion this time around would mean everything. How much? Put it this way, I can’t see Alex Ferguson getting more pleasure than I would from taking my team into League One. That might sound daft but it illustrates just how deeply I care about Bradford. This club is in my heart and soul. Every win we get gives me so much satisfaction, it’s unreal.”

Should Stuart succeed, we’ll be looking back and noting promotion was not achieved because of throwing pots of money at it; but by using the club’s resources to build a hungry team desperate to succeed, having gone through years of hardship as punishment for going down the route of spending beyond our means. In it’s own way that will make the achievement seem greater and be celebrated wilder – the feeling we’ve earned it after years of punishment.

Two years ago this site looked at how the club could arrest itself from the decline and, while there has been more misery since it, some of those ideals have been followed. Success can be an overnight thing when money’s thrown at it, and of course it shouldn’t be forgotten that the investment of Mark Lawn has speeded up our recovery, but it can be hollower and raise headaches further down the line.

It might be a long time before we play Man City on merit again, but if they are now living the dream it’s not one all of us are interested in pursuing anymore. Reality could prove far more enjoyable.

3 Responses to “The dream you’d no longer want to live”

  1. John Wade Says:

    Well said.

    A friend of mine supports Blackpool and when they reached the Championship he said they had achieved all they could realistically ever hope for and it was truly wonderful.

    The same applied to me when City reached the Premiership and no Manchester City fan will get the same pleasure by simply buying success.

    I agree with you that if City ever get back to the Championship it will be far better to me than anything Manchester City can ever achieve.

  2. James Ramsden Says:

    So in that respect, do you wish that Mark Lawn or Julian Rhodes never saved the club from administration, and we were starting our way again in football from the non leagues? I should imagine that when were on the brinks of going under,you were like the rest of us hoping that someone was going to come in with a lot of money to invest in the club and get us back “where we belong”? I also think that many City fans loved watching Carbone and Collymore and the buzz that they provided. Man City fans are feeling this exact same buzz.

    I admire your tradionalist, grass roots view of football - but unfortunately in this day and age, football is a business. Fair enough not so much in division two, but it still requires money to move up the leagues. If football was based entirely on youth development and links in the community, Crewe Alexandra would have been in the Premiership by now would they not?

    The simple facts are, that if we go up this season (and I believe we will) then we will have to spend money to succeed in bringing players with bigger wage packets into the club when we are in League One. If we want to replace these players with home grown youth talent, then we will have to find some money to improve the training facilities at the club or widen the scouting network. This would mean the club looking for additional investment from the board, or an additional investor added to the board.

    Unfortuantely its not jumpers for goalposts anymore, its billionaires for chairman now. And if an Arab came sniffing round Bradford City, then I would be extremely interested in what he had planned for Bradford City.

  3. Jason Mckeown Says:

    James, I’m not sure I understand your first point. Of course I wanted someone (Julian) to save us and not go to non-league. I would equally hate any club, even Leeds, to go out of business because of their owner’s reckless spending. I didn’t care about anyone taking us ‘back to where we belong’ as I don’t go in for that stuff. I just wanted to continue watching the club I love.

    If I played too much emphasis on youth development it wasn’t my intention, but I think a football club should be an active part of its community and youth development is a part. Not in the sense that kids have to get into the team, but more the development they get from being at the club, including going to college and learning other life skills. Of course you want to see some break through and Man City have been very good at this in recent years, but it’s not the be all and end all and if someone had suggested Stuart didn’t sign any players this summer so more of our youngsters got a chance I’d have strongly disagreed.

    You may be right about the club needing investment if we go up, but if that’s the case I’d hope it was in the right areas. I don’t agree with Man City’s owners signing up players on ridiclously large money because it’s not self sustaining, nor are the players there for any other reason. If the owners pulled out Man City the club would still have to honour the contracts, just like Chelsea, and they’d probably end up going bust. More likely Man City fans will have to pay by increased ticket prices (it’s not received much press attention but I gather a lot of people have stopped going to watch Man U since the Glazers because they can’t afford it). If City attracted more investment which allowed us to pay more for players great, but only if it was still largely within our means and was reflected in commercial revenue and gate receipts.

    When we were in the Premiership I loved it (no matter what we’ve suffered, I will always be grateful I saw someone of Beni’s ability in Claret and Amber) but I don’t believe the Premiership is the same place anymore and my personal view is I’m not sure I’d want City back there.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

BfB does not post all comments and those it does post are moderated and are not put on the site until they are approved.

Comments will only be approved if they are attached to a real name and email address (which we will never share with anyone) makes an interesting point about the issues raised in the article or report it appears with.

We want you to express opinions but this is not the OMB and never will be so backbiting, flaming, tongue lashing, needless meanness and general bad behaviour will not get onto this site.

It is how we make sure BfB stays good.

Next/Previous