Thought McCall should have taken Heckingbottom off before he was sent off - he could have gone earlier. However if we had stayed 4-4-2 I am not sure we would have made the breakthrough. Thought Clarke did alright trying to sort out Gnakpa who I thought was their best player and this seemed to galvanise the team.

I too carried on with people around me about booing Conlon. Its a disgrace. Similar circumstance to when Andy Cooke came on a few seasons back and got the goal to beat Gillingham on the last few minutes. In my opinion, Boulding was not effective on Sat due to the conditions negating his ability to get in behind. Now play Barry up there and at least you have a defender who is going to have to go with him to defend, leaving space for the Daleys and the Colbecks to make breaks onto the box.

When we scored I turned to those same fans with clenched fists and gritted teeth and shouted, ‘Now f#cking boo him’. Yes, I could and probably should have been smacked, but I couldn’t resist having a pop back at the people who claim to love our club.

With fans like that, how can we expect to win anything this season?

I have no argument to vent with the Luton fans - what else can they do but carry on supporting their club the best way they can - the enormity of their task this season is clear to see and i wish them the Luton payers,staff/directors and fans the best of luck in trying to avoid the drop.

Going back to City, well we stopped the rot at least yesterday - hearing on the radio that McCall wants an udefeated spell in October - and a draw was probable as a bet yesterday based on our lack of them this season.
There are some who are questioning the abilities of McCall and Jacobs, to those i say shut the **** up and get behind the cause - our best option is to support them 100% not snipe and boo at substitutions and tactics.

I also disagreed with your assessment above - going to 4-4-1 was the correct thing to do. Imagine what would have happened if we stayed at 3-4-2 with 5 minutes to go whilst one up and then they had equalised.

Decent enough game I thought - but agree that we lack the spark of the first few games..

You may feel that the FA did not protect Luton Town from its directors but I would say that it did not protect football from your directors and as a part of football and as a club robbed of money from progression by those directors then we were more wronged than you.

The fact that your punishment is retroactive is annoying for us because at the time - a half season away from our second spell in Administration - we could have done with the money that could have come from the 4th round of the cup and while progression was by no means assured it is also clear and not argued against that Luton were not playing on what we would call a level playing field. I understand the mechanics of football administration and can tell you that we too were still being run by a management who were answerable to administrators and were barely able to have a club. The fact that when we were on our knees you were behaving in a way that showed “a flagrant disregard for the Regulations laid down to protect the game” is hardly something that should engender sympathy.

You benefited at our expense and we spent all summer raising money and almost lost our club. You want us to feel sorry for you and not be bitter? I’m using the word brassneck again.

So it is not untrue to say that I do not have the sympathy for you that other people have.

{note the text amend. “To players” should have read “in regards to players”}

This is simply untrue and lazy bitter writing.

1. Luton Town did not make illegal payments to players
2. We beat you in the FA when we were in administrative receivership* and being run by Barry Ward a court appointed receiver, so we were barely able to pay anyone legally let alone illegally.

*Please note we were only in adminstraive receivership as a lever to remove rogue owner John Gurney. For more information see http://www.lutonfc.com/gurney.asp