last year, at the end of October
That’s character – Grimsby Town 1 Bradford City 3
Grimsby Town 1 Bradford City 3 - League Two 2008/09
It wasn’t a night where the attacking swagger of football which characterised Bradford City’s excellent start to the season fully returned, but nevertheless manager Stuart McCall will have been delighted with those answers his players did provide to the questions raised of them.
In the wake of Monday’s disappointing defeat at Darlington, Stuart had stated he needed big characters to reverse a season in danger of slipping away and, after Matt Clarke’s controversial early sending off, the remaining players had 78 minutes to prove how much resilience they had. Whether the feeling of injustice helped spirit or it was a strong determination not to let things slip again, they responded by scoring a further two goals and then put in an excellent defensive shift which partially answers increasing accusations they aren’t good enough at the back to last the distance.
After the match Stuart admitted the referee had no choice to send Clarke off, though he did not have the benefit of such a good view of the incident as the 803 travelling City fans behind the goal. Grimsby’s Nathan Jarman had charged through only for the former Darlington defender to produce a risky, but clean, tackle to stop his route to goal. As both players laid on the ground referee Graham Salisbury consulted with his assistant before producing the red card and awarding a free kick.
It means that, in each of Sailsbury’s last three occasions he has officiated a City game, a red card for a player in claret and amber has been produced. The other two – Jermaine Johnson at home to Yeovil in January 2007 and Guylain Ndumbu-Nsungu in last season’s FA Cup win against Chester – were also questionable decisions and one is left to wonder how credible the term ‘coincidence’ can be to the decisions Sailsbury has made against City. Though given Clarke’s challenge had been inside the box, the home side will also feel aggrieved they were not awarded a penalty.
The red card punctured City’s excellent start to the game. Having taken the lead after six minutes when Omar Daley latched onto a weak headed clearance, beat the full back and charged across the penalty area before unleashing a fierce drive into the top corner, a convincing away victory looked probable. Graeme Lee caused panic in the area soon after and the home defence struggled to clear their lines following another corner. Paul McLaren and Dean Furman looked busy in the centre and Daley was a constant menace.
The sending off saw that particular threat deactivated as Stuart sacrificed the Jamaican for the on-loan Tom Clarke to make his debut at right back, with TJ Moncur moved across to the centre where he looks more comfortable. Both were kept busy as Grimsby sought to take advantage of the extra man, though the chances they did create were often wasted by poor shooting.
To City’s credit they did not sit back either and tightened their grip with a second goal on the half hour. McLaren set Colbeck away on the right and his burst towards goal was blocked on the edge of the area. Ex-Mariner Michael Boulding was following up and unleashed a superb low drive which flew into the bottom corner. It was Boulding’s fifth strike of the season and, the impressive manner he’s been tucking away chances when presented to him only adds to the frustration at the lack of service he’s been getting in previous games. City are still working out how to get the best of a player who scored 25 goals for a relegated club last season.
Unsurprisingly Grimsby exerted strong pressure at the start of the second half in an effort to get back into the game and Rhys Evans made two excellent saves, but it was heartening to see how many balls into the box were cleared by a City head. The Bantams more obvious quality going forward was soon rewarded again when a rare corner was met by Lee’s diving header at the far post. Had he and his colleagues been marking so badly at the other end a home win may have resulted, but captain Lee’s exuberant celebrations for his first City goal were much deserved during an evening that he led his team so well. Special mention should also go to the corner taker McLaren; he’s received a lot of criticism recently but his last few performances have shown improvement. Think back to some of City’s goals in recent weeks and consider how many have featured City’s number 4 in the build up.
With the game seemingly over Grimsby suddenly pulled a goal back through Liam Trotter’s header to set up a final 25 minutes of pressure, but it would be the only blemish on City’s defence all night. Evans hasn’t fully convinced in goal since joining during the summer, but had an excellent game with the confident manner he deals with high balls into the box something which can only spread through the rest of the team. It was also heartening to see Luke O’Brien stand up to such a big test and, with each recent game, he is blossoming.
The final whistle was met with some ugly scenes in the home end as some Grimsby fans tried to charge onto the pitch, with Mike Newell recently put in charge it was presumably the players who were the target of their anger. It’s 20 games since they last won; but while that might lessen the impressiveness of this result for City, how victory was earned and the recent dismal record when facing teams on such poor runs means the 10-men deserve plenty of credit.
It wasn’t a game won through the attacking ability the team processes – it was shown on occasions, but it’s nothing we didn’t know before – but the way in which the players, particularly at the back, stood up and showed a robustness which has been lacking. Promotion is not ultimately won during games against struggling teams, but it can easily be lost.
So it’s back to Valley Parade for games against Bury and Barnet and the target must be six points to continue the recovery. Expectations will be allowed to creep up again and, with the Shakers having enjoyed an excellent start themselves, the Valley Parade support needs to be rediscover its own early season form on Tuesday and offer the sort of backing which so impressively helped the team at Blundell Park.
Matt Clarke will be suspended, as too will Omar Daley after picking up a fifth booking of the season. Joe Colbeck is also a doubt after been stretchered off with ten minutes to go. It all adds up to a few headaches for Stuart, though after Friday’s win he can be confident his team has the character to still deliver.
October 25th, 2008 at 11:48
Last night restored my faith in being a City fan & also in the team this season. With the exception of Clarke (who made a bad mistake to be sent off) it would be difficult to criticise any players.
When we needed to be brave we were, when we needed to pass the ball we did, & when we got chances we put them away. Particular credit goes to Furman, I thought he was excellent throughout.
Promotion’s now back on…..
October 25th, 2008 at 15:27
Hipperholme Bantam, had you really written off promotion after 12 games!? Or is that some sort of pointed jibe at some of the fickle voices around VP? It might interest you to know that the last time we won promotion we only had 18 points at this stage of the season.
Having seen Clarke’s challenge on the telly it’s the shirt pulling that allows him to get in a fair challenge that gets him sent off. And that started outside the box. Obviously if it was the challenge itself then it would have been a penalty. I’m normally one to call the referees out but there’s no way we can complain about that decision, and given his recent form maybe it was a blessing in disguise…
Wins at Blundell Park should be what we’re aiming for but don’t forget we didn’t manage it last year and 08/09 is going to be judged on how much better than 07/08 we are. So this 2 point ‘improvement’ offsets the points we dropped on Monday.
I reckon we’re 5 points up on how we did last year. Any more than 1 point from Bury & Barnet and we’ll build on that.
October 26th, 2008 at 15:13
Hi Wellers
I’ve since seen the sending off on TV and am still unconvinced. At the time the referee played on and then, when Clarke made the tackle, the assistant suddenly started flagging, which to me suggested he was flagging for the tackle otherwise he’d have flagged at the ‘shirt tugging’ (it’s not the assistant’s job to play advantage, he must wave his flag when the foul occurs and then it’s up to the ref). The ref noticed and blew up but, incredibly, didn’t go over and speak to the assistant and just sent Clarke off.
To me it was the wrong decision and I don’t think Clarke really tugged the guy’s shirt (the TV footage isn’t conclusive because there’s a pillar in the way of the camera, so I’m not sure how it can be judged that he clearly tugged his shirt). Had we gone onto lose more would have been made of this, but if you think a decision is wrong I think you have to say so regardless of the result otherwise it can be seen as sour grapes.
No offence but you don’t seem to be a Matt Clarke fan, so is this clouding judgement?
October 27th, 2008 at 8:23
“Evans hasn’t fully convinced in goal since joining in the summer…”
I’m sorry but I totally disagree with that statement.
Apart from the free kick at Darlington I can’t think of Evans “pulling a Donovan”.
I think he’s been superb between the sticks - his shot stopping, decision making, organisation have been second to none…
October 27th, 2008 at 21:34
Sorry Jason, but for once, I don’t agree with you.
I think was rightly a free-kick and a sending off. Why the linesman didn’t flag initially I don’t know, but it was definitely a tug. I have seen it quite a few times on TV and don’t understand the ‘post in the way’ comment. There isn’t even a post in view. He clearly tugged their man back before getting in a clean tackle. Had the referee or the linesman given the foul, it would also have been a penalty. Ben (above) is spot in in his post.
As for ‘Evans hasn’t fully convinced in goal since joining in the summer’, are you having a laugh? With the two guys in front of him acting like amateurs of late, can you be surprised if he has looked nervous. Even with that in mind, he has been one of the more consistent players so far. The only gripe I have is with his distribution. He hasn’t known when to roll it out to his fullbacks or when to punt it long.
October 28th, 2008 at 8:00
Wayne thanks for your comments.
I don’t know what you mean when you say there wasn’t a post in the way, I’ve watched it a few times on youtube and there is definitely a pillar which blocks the camera’s view of Clarke and Jarman. I’ve spoken to a few fans over the weekend and read comments online and lots of people are saying it wasn’t a foul (and others, like you, say it clearly was), so not just me who disagrees with the referee. I was right level with where Clarke was when at the game and I personally don’t believe it was a tug and, like I say, the linesman didn’t flag until Clarke made the tackle. Anyway just my opinion.
As for your Rhys Evans views, you’re contradicting yourself. You ask if I’m ‘having a laugh’ when I say he hasn’t fully convinced but then you go on to criticise his distribution. Surely be definition this means he hasn’t fully convinced you?
I’m not out to attack Evans, I do like him and I think he is a decent keeper who hasn’t done much wrong since joining in the summer. I don’t agree our centre backs have been as bad as you make out, though I accept the more solid performance of Lee and Moncur on Friday certainly helped Evans. Again, I’ve spoken to others who are not convinced by Evans, so it’s not just me; nothing major but my personal opinion is he’s decent for this level but if we were to go up we might want to bring in someone else.
October 28th, 2008 at 11:20
I can’t remember the other two sendings off, but this was a clear red card. Sometimes you have to be fair, I’m afraid! He pulled the guy back and that’s why he was able to get the tackle in; if he hadn’t pulled him back, he’d have been in and so that’s a red card. To accuse the ref of being a cheat cos he’s sent 3 of our players off is a bit dodgy. Sometimes like Hereford at home last year and the Burnley game a few years ago, you may question the ref’s honesty, but generally it’s their competence that is the question.